off-topic 
Out of respect for others using the forum (which @mods pine away for yet offer little), my DM’s are open for discussion in the hopes of offering clarity of confusion & assumptions.
No expectations other than 
s.
Accurate.
Clearly you were not attacked as you so feel, the docs post was merely the quickest find w/search; nothing more.
As you yourself have went to great lengths to document the confusion surrounding it’s subject matter, the 2nd link is hella confusing enough for yourself (someone in the “know”) to have to explain away as much as it would be for stakeholders you’re soliciting.
Perhaps the inability to accept feedback from your potential customer base with grace isn’t the best characteristic for a communications manager?
Inaccurate.
I’m sorry to hear that you feel this way but, you’re wrong. If you’d like to communicate further about your misunderstanding, I welcome your thoughts via DM.
If you’d like a textbook example of passive-aggressiveness communiqué, here’s one:
Hardly upset. Curious as to why experience backed posts are derailed so hard by the “team”. Additionally puzzled by your personal requests for contributions while also driving them away. 
Sure does give me “glowie” goosebumps though. 
Perhaps try something like this?
SELECT posts FROM forum WHERE groupid = mods AND WHERE userid = cayce
Solely within this thread as an example, we have two “team” members taking talking points out of context (an increasingly defining trend within moderation) and transmogrifying them into alleged attacks while intentionally being offensively condescending and talking down to another user for no other reason other than this user has presented healthy dissent.
Others have come before you, just as others have come before I, others will come after us.
From my perspective, I see two men mansplaining how the world works.