It’s not a difference of R4.1 vs. R4.2, but rather of the installer’s partitioning style for the LVM Thin layout vs. the Btrfs layout. FWIW the latter has the advantage of making it easier to use an ephemeral swap encryption key, although that’s not yet done automatically:
Yep, the file-reflink driver (for Btrfs) and the lvm_thin driver have a different approach of accounting for disk usage, and it can look a little odd in Qube Manager: