Fedora Council has approved the latest version of the AI-Assisted Contributions policy

General Discussion
1

Once they include (RedHat-driven) AI slop, will Fedora still be reliable enough for dom0?

What do you think?

1 Like
2

To be honest… after endless threads on the topic of “why Fedora for dom0?”, the final conclusion was that Fedora was someone’s preference, and was never chosen for its suitability. I hope that this is the final straw, though.

3

Oof?

Fedora was quite the good distro.
Recent packages, stable

4

While the old discussion about the dom0 distribution was more or less about style and infrastructure/features, I see this most recent change as rather substantial difference.

1 Like
5

Proposed permission to use AI for code review seems concerning. The agreed-upon version clarifies that AI must not be the sole or final arbiter, which is good, but vague. I interpret it as people are allowed to use AI for review as long as it does a decent job.

6

Yes. As long as it does a decent job. The other major concern was copyright concerns. Like how the AI was trained and if the data sources used to train it are compatible from licensing perspective.

3 Likes
7

Once they include (RedHat-driven) AI slop, will Fedora still be reliable enough for dom0?

I already questioned how reliable it has been so far, and @barto nailed a perfect summary of that in the current thread.

What do you think?

This subject must attract the attention of Qubes devs.

1 Like