I was reading up on split-gpg2 and I came across this topic where @adrelanos recommends Sequoia-pgp. My curiosity can’t let something like that pass by, especially with the known security issues with gpg. The linked topic didn’t really develop, and I’m fishing for opinions other than the links in that topic.
I wanted to ask you guys if your workflow uses this, and how it compares with gpg2 from a user standpoint. Do i get it right in thinking it’s split-gpg2 with additional packages?
The last release of the cli interface (sequoia-chameleon-gnupg) is from March last year, as far as I can see. There looks to be a whole bunch of packages to install, and some elements to be sorted (–export-secret etc).
I’ll guess it’s too early for porting user documentation from GnuPG to Sequoia-PGP?
kicksecure-18 template is available.
How about this? Does it work out?