Claude Fable refuses to work!
Here’s the answer:
Fable 5’s safeguards flagged this message. The safeguards are intentionally broad right now and may flag safe and routine coding, cybersecurity, or biology work. These measures let us bring you Mythos-level capabilities sooner, and we’re working to refine them. Switched to Opus 4.8.
Claude Opus 4.8 max is running
Prompt build with help of Google AI:
You are a professional security researcher and expert code auditor specializing in Python and Qubes OS security architecture.
### Task
Begin by reading and analyzing @README.md and @README-AUDIT.md in the current directory to fully understand the project architecture, security assumptions, and existing audit scope. After establishing this context, audit the codebase of qubes-snitch in the current directory and its subfolders. You have access to the file system, so please read the relevant files automatically. Start by identifying the main entry points (e.g., the GUI/daemon components, qrexec services, and policy configurations).
### IMPORTANT: Live Logging & Token Protection (File-Only Output)
To prevent data loss and drastically reduce token consumption, you must write all detailed findings directly to a file named `audit-results-opus-4.8-max.md` in the current directory.
* **Rule 1:** Every time you identify a Critical or High issue, immediately write/append it to `audit-results-opus-4.8-max.md` using your file-writing capabilities.
* **Rule 2 (Terminal Silence):** Do NOT print the detailed findings (descriptions, impacts, remediations) into the chat/terminal window. In the terminal, you are only allowed to print brief, single-line status updates (e.g., "Found High severity issue in daemon.py, written to file.").
### Strict Severity Filter
* **CRITICAL & HIGH SEVERITY ONLY:** Focus 100% of your analysis on identifying issues that present an immediate, severe threat (e.g., arbitrary code execution, unauthorized prompt bypass, privilege escalation, or unhandled exceptions that crash the core daemon).
* **IGNORE MEDIUM & LOW:** Do NOT analyze, mention, or list any Medium or Low severity issues, minor bugs, or standard linter/code-style warnings. If a finding is not Critical or High, completely omit it.
### Scope & Specific Goals
Analyze the Python code specifically for high-impact issues that can lead to:
1. **Inter-VM Bypass / Escape:** Flaws in handling untrusted input from the `qrexec` protocol or JSON IPC payloads that could allow a compromised AppVM to execute unauthorized commands or manipulate the snitch daemon.
2. **Denial of Service (DoS):** Unhandled Python exceptions, resource exhaustion, or state-machine deadlocks that crash the snitch service, potentially failing-open or locking the user out.
3. **UI/Prompt Tampering:** Race conditions, logical flaws, or spoofing vulnerabilities in the desktop notification/interception prompt that could trick a user into approving an unauthorized connection.
4. **Privilege Escalation:** Insecure handling of file permissions, configuration files, or subprocess calls executing with elevated privileges.
### Output Format (Strictly inside `audit-results-opus-4.8-max.md` ONLY)
For every Critical or High issue found, format it inside the Markdown file as follows:
* **File & Line/Function:** (Where the issue is located)
* **Severity:** (Critical / High)
* **Description:** (How the issue works and what triggers it)
* **Impact:** (What happens if this is exploited)
* **Remediation:** (Specific code snippet or advice to fix it)
### Execution Instruction
Do not ask me to paste files. Use your file-reading capabilities to first inspect `README.md` and `README-AUDIT.md`, and then proceed to the current directory containing daemon scripts, UI components, and Qubes policy definitions. Start your analysis now, prioritizing high-impact targets, and remember to append findings to `audit-results-opus-4.8-max.md` instantly while keeping the terminal output strictly to minimal status alerts.
Here is the result: Please let your fancy AIs scan my Qubes-Snitch code to find bugs - #34 by queen