I’ve now closed the polls. Thanks everybody for your participation. I hope people are satisfied. Even if these where not your preferred ones.
Here’s what we’ll go with:
-
Category Name - All around Qubes
(I’ll just leave here the notice that if many people are misunderstanding the title as in here we’ll have to go to the second option) -
Category Icon -
mug-hot (I guess as in “cafe”) -
Category Color - yellow as no strong opposition arrived
-
Category Short Description - there seems to be some disagreement on the exact wording of this. My proposal (trying to harmonize and reduce the size) would be:
Relevant but not specific to Qubes (security, privacy, software freedom, system administration, …). ← This is literally the already-decided criteria for inclusion.
What do you think about this? I mean, we can tweak it later, but I’d say this should not delay the category launch further.
-
Inclusion criteria - relevant but not specific to Qubes OS
-
Inclusion examples - @Sven, do you think the following examples are fine / representative?
- OpSec / Threat Modeling (security)
- Is your browser fingerprint unique? (privacy)
- Good books / presentations / tutorials about security / privacy / linux administration / …
- How do I … on Debian/Fedora/Windows/…? (related to Qubes)
-
Exclusion criteria - relevant but not specific to Qubes OS
- about Qubes (belong to other categories)
- not relevant at all to Qubes OS use
- harmful to community / violates CoC
- politics / activism of any kind
@Sven, I’ve tried to consolidate the proposed ones. See if you agree.
-
Exclusion examples - @sven do you think these are fine?
- How to promote Qubes? (belongs to #general-discussion )
- Latest baseball game results (not at all relevant to Qubes use)
- something that violates the Code of Conduct
-
Category Moderator: @Sven
-
Joining criteria: forum members (trust level 2)
We’re pretty close to finally having this open! 
Tagging: @fsflover @ludovic @rooftop @427F11FD0FAA4B080123 @oijawyuh @Sven @fiftyfourthparallel (those who voted)