The picture is just to show an example of {application-missing-in-template}. It’s not mine. A kind user showed me in the thread below. A series of issues with {application-missing-in-template} are written here.
Anyway, there are two important questions for me. The first is why this happened and what needs to be done to solve this situation. The second is that using a Qube with a part of {application-missing-in-template} as a VpnQube for multiple Qubes may be problematic from an anonymity perspective.
I don’t know if it will be useful for the first question. But I will provide you with information here.
・The storage used by Qubes as a whole seems to be about 20%, so it is not possible to run out of storage.
・Every time, an error seems to occur when installing 0.1GB more, and a message is displayed that the new Qube failed to start.
・ I have tried nearly 10 times so far, and the target is Fedora40, Fedora40Xfce, Fedora42, and Fedora 42Xfce (solene says Fedora41 has not yet been tried).
・Basically, all {basic systems} are not included, but in rare cases only some are in the {application-missing-in-template} state. Sys-firewall. I am also doing other work in parallel with installing the new template.
For the second question, I can’t create a VpnQube in the first place without all the {basic systems} in it. However, in the other thread above, the {application-missing-in-template} item of the newly installed Qube was only partial, so I was able to solve it by simply installing the {basic system}. But does copying and duplicating a Qube with the characteristic information that you have installed a specific {basic system} and linking it to multiple AppQubes as multiple VpnQubes in this way compromises anonymity?
I would like to know your thoughts on these two questions of mine. 